People v. C.J.
Client was charged with a class-four felony, crime of violence, and facing up to 16 years in prison. Through thorough investigation, firm advocacy, and multiple negotiations with the District Attorney, we were able to obtain a deferred judgment and sentence to a class-three misdemeanor with just six months of probation and no added conditions for our Client.
Client was charged with a class-four felony, crime of violence, and facing up to 16 years in prison. Through thorough investigation, firm advocacy, and multiple negotiations with the District Attorney, we were able to obtain a deferred judgment and sentence to a class-three misdemeanor with just six months of probation and no added conditions for our Client.
Interest of S.M.
Client's niece filed a faulty claim against him and motioned to remove him as co-guardian for his sister. Niece's claim was based on assumption only and had no basis in fact. Through investigation, witness interviews, and a successful, contested court hearing, we were able to reveal the truth and show that, in fact, niece was the one who had committed the act she claimed was a breach of fiduciary duties. Client remained in his position as co-guardian. Niece's motion for removal was denied. Client was awarded attorney fees and costs.
Client's niece filed a faulty claim against him and motioned to remove him as co-guardian for his sister. Niece's claim was based on assumption only and had no basis in fact. Through investigation, witness interviews, and a successful, contested court hearing, we were able to reveal the truth and show that, in fact, niece was the one who had committed the act she claimed was a breach of fiduciary duties. Client remained in his position as co-guardian. Niece's motion for removal was denied. Client was awarded attorney fees and costs.
In Re Parental Responsibilities of E.C
Our client and his partner had reconciled but had not updated their child support order. We were able to successfully prove to the court that there had been a mutually-agreed-upon change in primary care, allowing us to legally negate child support payments for the previous year, which resulted in $0 in arrears for our client.
Our client and his partner had reconciled but had not updated their child support order. We were able to successfully prove to the court that there had been a mutually-agreed-upon change in primary care, allowing us to legally negate child support payments for the previous year, which resulted in $0 in arrears for our client.
Interest of R.B.
Client had cognitive and physical impairments and was being financially exploited by third parties. A family member petitioned for Guardianship and Conservatorship, and Client joined in the petition. However, a unique Visitor’s report was produced and threw a wrench in the uncontested matter. We were able to clearly represent our position and shore up the rebuttal information to make our Client’s wishes heard and made a reality.
Client had cognitive and physical impairments and was being financially exploited by third parties. A family member petitioned for Guardianship and Conservatorship, and Client joined in the petition. However, a unique Visitor’s report was produced and threw a wrench in the uncontested matter. We were able to clearly represent our position and shore up the rebuttal information to make our Client’s wishes heard and made a reality.
Interest of K.E.
Client needed to track down heirlooms held by estranged mother and negotiate their return. We were able to professionally and successfully receive all requested items without litigation.
Client needed to track down heirlooms held by estranged mother and negotiate their return. We were able to professionally and successfully receive all requested items without litigation.
Greeley Attorney, Brynne Gant, wins the Avvo Client’s Choice Award
It’s always awkward to brag, but we love our clients and are happy that they love us! We are proud to announce that Greeley Family Law and Probate and Estate Law Attorney, Brynne Gant, has been awarded the Avvo Client’s Choice Award. Thank you so much to all our amazing clients who took the time to leave a review for Brynne. As I’m sure you can imagine, online reviews are invaluable and we appreciate you sharing your positive experiences with others.
Interest of A.C.
Client’s friend was at great risk of exploitation on account of cognitive impairments. The friend was having trouble navigating VA benefits and other financial needs. We were able to successfully appoint Client as Guardian and Conservator despite a Visitor report that missed important information and resulted in a questionable recommendation.
Client’s friend was at great risk of exploitation on account of cognitive impairments. The friend was having trouble navigating VA benefits and other financial needs. We were able to successfully appoint Client as Guardian and Conservator despite a Visitor report that missed important information and resulted in a questionable recommendation.
Greeley attorney, Brynne Gant, nominated as "Top 40 Under 40" in Colorado by The National Trial Lawyers
We are proud to announce that Greeley attorney, Brynne Gant nominated in National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 in Colorado by The National Trial Lawyers.
This nomination distinguishes Brynne as one of the top trial lawyers in the state, region, and in Greeley, which comes as no surprise with her level of trial experience as a former District Attorney.
The National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 under 40 is a professional organization composed of the top trial lawyers from each state or region who are under the age of 40. Membership into The National Trial Lawyers: Top 40 under 40 is by invitation only and is extended exclusively to those trial lawyers practicing civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense law.
Membership is extended solely to the select few of the most qualified attorneys from each state who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature and public profile measured by objective and uniformly applied standards in compliance with state bar and national Rule 4-7. Invitees must exemplify superior qualifications, trial results, and leadership as a young lawyer under the age of 40. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research.
Each of our distinguished Top 40 under 40 members strives to encompass the knowledge, skill, experience and success held by only the best lawyers in America. It is our mission to promote a unique and professional networking opportunity for young lawyers, while developing progressive ideas to pursue justice for those injured by the negligence of others, to educate the public about the importance of access to courts that are free of bias and undue influence, and to protect the right of trial by jury.
This and more information can be found here.
People v. W.L.
Client was charged with Violation of a Protection Order. The charge was based on a technicality that was a grey area in the law. By reviewing the law, negotiating with the DA, and advising our client to participate in pre-sentence treatment, we were able to convince the DA that the right thing to do was dismiss the case. The DA eventually agreed, and the case was dismissed.
Client was charged with Violation of a Protection Order. The charge was based on a technicality that was a grey area in the law. By reviewing the law, negotiating with the DA, and advising our client to participate in pre-sentence treatment, we were able to convince the DA that the right thing to do was dismiss the case. The DA eventually agreed, and the case was dismissed.
Marriage of B.M.
Client’s ex made speculative accusations that got our client’s parenting time restricted. By taking immediate, proactive steps to remedy the situation, we were able to help our client get parenting time restored even before the very first restriction review date.
Client’s ex made speculative accusations that got our client’s parenting time restricted. By taking immediate, proactive steps to remedy the situation, we were able to help our client get parenting time restored even before the very first restriction review date.
Marriage of M.F.
Client’s spouse was hiding assets and increasing debt unilaterally. Through a negotiated agreement, we were able to successfully reduce spouse’s share of marital assets and waive alimony on account of these behaviors.
Client’s spouse was hiding assets and increasing debt unilaterally. Through a negotiated agreement, we were able to successfully reduce spouse’s share of marital assets and waive alimony on account of these behaviors.
Interest of K.B.
Client’s ex refused to allow child to participate in extracurricular activities, and the previous parenting plan had no provision for the same. Through mediation, we were able to reach a full agreement that remedied this loop-hole in the previous parenting plan.
Client’s ex refused to allow child to participate in extracurricular activities, and the previous parenting plan had no provision for the same. Through mediation, we were able to reach a full agreement that remedied this loop-hole in the previous parenting plan.
Marriage of T.M.
Client and spouse had a complex property distribution matter. Through a negotiated settlement, we were able to reach a full agreement, but spouse continually attempted to change the provisions of the same. Through persistence and vigilance, we were able to prevent each said attempt and finally resolve the matter with a partial award of attorney fees on top of the negotiated agreement.
Client and spouse had a complex property distribution matter. Through a negotiated settlement, we were able to reach a full agreement, but spouse continually attempted to change the provisions of the same. Through persistence and vigilance, we were able to prevent each said attempt and finally resolve the matter with a partial award of attorney fees on top of the negotiated agreement.
People v. K. T.
Client was charged with DUI and Careless Driving. Client’s BAC was .246. Through client interviewing and investigation, we were able to highlight for the DA holes in the case and our client’s good behavior, resulting in a plea to DWAI and Weaving. The client was able to retain a driver’s license.
Client was charged with DUI and Careless Driving. Client’s BAC was .246. Through client interviewing and investigation, we were able to highlight for the DA holes in the case and our client’s good behavior, resulting in a plea to DWAI and Weaving. The client was able to retain a driver’s license.
Marriage of J.M.
Client and ex were involved in high-conflict post-decree dispute. Our client wanted 50/50 parenting time while ex wanted our client to have only 1-2 overnights per week. With the help of a great Child and Family Investigator, and through a negotiated settlement, we were able to secure 50/50 parenting time for our client.
Client and ex were involved in high-conflict post-decree dispute. Our client wanted 50/50 parenting time while ex wanted our client to have only 1-2 overnights per week. With the help of a great Child and Family Investigator, and through a negotiated settlement, we were able to secure 50/50 parenting time for our client.
Marriage of G.W.
Father of child suffered from substance abuse issues. Through a contested hearing, we were able to restrict Father’s parenting time while he seeks treatment. Through settlement negotiations, we also reached a full agreement for when the restriction is lifted, saving the parties significant costs on attorney fees and court expenses.
Father of child suffered from substance abuse issues. Through a contested hearing, we were able to restrict Father’s parenting time while he seeks treatment. Through settlement negotiations, we also reached a full agreement for when the restriction is lifted, saving the parties significant costs on attorney fees and court expenses.
Marriage of A.T.
Father was extremely abusive and controlling to both our client and their shared children. Through a Child and Family Investigator and a contested hearing, we were able to secure nearly full custody to our client and paternal grandmother, ensuring that Father’s parenting time was wholly supervised at all times.
Father was extremely abusive and controlling to both our client and their shared children. Through a Child and Family Investigator and a contested hearing, we were able to secure nearly full custody to our client and paternal grandmother, ensuring that Father’s parenting time was wholly supervised at all times.
Interest of K.O.
Client’s grandchild was born premature and incurred major medical expenses. Grandchild’s parents could not qualify for government assistance but neither could they afford health insurance. Through an emergency (and regular) guardianship and special (and regular) conservatorship, we were able to appoint client as guardian and conservator such that client’s health insurance covered the child, saving the parties significant medical costs.
Client’s grandchild was born premature and incurred major medical expenses. Grandchild’s parents could not qualify for government assistance but neither could they afford health insurance. Through an emergency (and regular) guardianship and special (and regular) conservatorship, we were able to appoint client as guardian and conservator such that client’s health insurance covered the child, saving the parties significant medical costs.
People v. O. O.
Client was charged with Third Degree Assault as an Act of Domestic Violence and Child Abuse-Knowing/Reckless-No Injury. Through negotiations with the DA, we were able to get a plea to Telephone Harassment as an Act of Domestic Violence, and the client was allowed to do probation from another state.
Client was charged with Third Degree Assault as an Act of Domestic Violence and Child Abuse-Knowing/Reckless-No Injury. Through negotiations with the DA, we were able to get a plea to Telephone Harassment as an Act of Domestic Violence, and the client was allowed to do probation from another state.
People v. H. I.
Client was charged with Third Degree Assault and Obstruction of Telephone Service both as Acts of Domestic Violence. Through review and investigation, we were able to show the DA that this was a case of self-defense. We got the charges completely dismissed.
Client was charged with Third Degree Assault and Obstruction of Telephone Service both as Acts of Domestic Violence. Through review and investigation, we were able to show the DA that this was a case of self-defense. We got the charges completely dismissed.